In a recent post on SDNCentral titled “Open Source: The Biggest Risk to SDN”, the author attempts to define the various types of open source business models, including how value is created for users and partners within an open source ecosystem. He described some risks facing partners and users when they are considering adopting code from “single-vendor” projects, specifically calling out the Floodlight and Indigo projects, which are supported in large part by Big Switch. And then he posits a scenario wherein Big Switch is acquired by a competitor with a poor open source track record (think: golden gate bridge, and switches and routers).
The author takes the position that single-vendor poses a risk to SDN adoption as a whole by concluding that users and partners should be very wary of using Floodlight & Indigo code because it is very likely that Cisco may very well acquire Big Switch and thus close the project down.
While I’m a reader of SDNCentral, I believe that the author misses the point entirely. Continue reading